Understanding whether you're a technical analyst or a tactical analyst changes everything about how you build your career.
I see this confusion constantly. People wanting to break into football analysis but trying to be everything at once — coding in Python one day, clipping video the next, building data pipelines in the morning and drawing tactical diagrams in the afternoon. The result is usually burnout and a portfolio that doesn't say anything clearly.
The reality is that most clubs think about analysts in two distinct categories, and understanding which one you are will save you years of misdirection.
The technical analyst
The technical analyst is the data person. They build models, write scripts, maintain databases, and create tools that the rest of the recruitment or coaching department can use. They're comfortable with Python, R, or SQL. They think in terms of systems, pipelines, and statistical rigour.
Their work often happens behind the scenes. They might never attend a match or watch a full 90 minutes of video as part of their workflow. Their job is to surface information at scale — filtering thousands of players down to shortlists, building expected metrics, or automating reports.
If you find yourself more interested in how to measure football than how to watch it, you're probably a technical analyst.
The tactical analyst
The tactical analyst is the football person. They watch matches, clip footage, build presentation decks for coaches, and understand the game in terms of movements, structures, and relationships between players.
They might use data to support their work, but their primary tool is video. They think in terms of pressing triggers, defensive shapes, and how a player fits within a system. Their output is usually visual — clips, slides, annotated sequences.
Why the distinction matters
When clubs hire, they know which role they're filling. A League One club looking for someone to clip opposition analysis footage doesn't need a Python developer. A Championship club building a data department doesn't need someone whose main skill is watching matches.
If you try to market yourself as both, you often end up looking like neither. The strongest candidates I've seen are the ones who picked a lane, went deep, and built a portfolio that reflects genuine expertise in one area.
That doesn't mean you can't have range. But your public-facing work — the stuff that gets you noticed — should have a clear identity.
How to figure out which one you are
Ask yourself a simple question: when you sit down to work on football in your own time, what do you reach for first? If it's a code editor, you're probably technical. If it's a video platform, you're probably tactical.
Neither is better. Both are needed. But knowing which one you are will help you build the right portfolio, apply for the right roles, and stop wasting time trying to be something you're not.