Same player, three different conclusions

Hey ,

Three people can watch the same footballer and walk away with completely different conclusions.

Not because one is wrong. But because each is looking through a different lens.

This is something that trips up a lot of people trying to break into football. They assume "player analysis" is one thing. One process. One skillset.

It isn't.

The role you're working in shapes the way you view players. And understanding that distinction matters more than most people realise.

The Performance Analyst: What's Happening Right Now?

The performance analyst has a fundamentally different relationship with player evaluation compared to the other two roles.

They're thinking short-term. Their goal is the next game. The next win.

So when they're reviewing players, they're typically focused on the last two or three matches. They're looking at tactical execution - the player's role within the team, their strengths and weaknesses, and whether there's anything to exploit.

Is there an outstanding strength to be aware of? A pattern that can be disrupted?

It's very little to do with the player's development. And nothing to do with whether the club should be interested in signing them.

Their lens is entirely about preparing for the upcoming match. That's it.

The Scout: What Could This Player Become?

A scout is still focused on immediate performance level. But they're also leaning into potential.

How will this player develop once they've matured physically? What's their scope for growth? How suitable is the league they're currently playing in compared to the one we're recruiting for?

As a scout, you're looking across four key areas - technical, tactical, psychological and physical attributes.

And importantly, you're assessing things that can be harder to pick up through data and video footage alone. Character. Communication. Attitude. Leadership.

These details are where in-person scouting comes into play. It's easier to see these live than through data or video.

Ultimately, the goal is straightforward - gather enough information to recommend a player to a club. That's the job.

The Recruitment Analyst: What's the Bigger Picture?

Even by the very name, a recruitment analyst is more strategic and insight-driven in how they view players.

They're looking at medium to longer-term impact, as well as short-term.

How would this player affect the current squad? What's the league suitability and how do exchange rates factor in? What's the cost versus projected output? What are the exit strategies and contingency plans?

A lot of this work combines efforts with data analysts and scientists.

They're also producing player dossiers, character references and telestration video reports. So while they are assessing what a player does on the pitch right now, the thinking behind it is rooted in due diligence and longer-term planning.

The Takeaway

All three roles are working to evaluate and assess players. But the skillsets, tools and processes behind each one are different.

If you're trying to build a career in this space, it helps to be honest about which lens suits you best.

Are you drawn to tactical detail and match preparation? That's performance analysis.

Do you love watching players, reading the human side, and forming opinions through observation? That's scouting.

Are you more strategic - thinking about squad building, data models and long-term planning? That's recruitment analysis.

You don't need to master all three. But understanding how they overlap - and where they don't - gives you a clearer picture of where you fit and what skills to develop next.

The worst thing you can do is try to be everything to everyone without understanding what each role actually demands.

Pick your lens. Then sharpen it.

Liam